One Crazy Scary Timeline

by Christopher Lovejoy on November 29, 2020

My most recent post on this site, Just How Free Can I Be?, is a strange one, moving from one extreme of freedom to another, and no doubt left some readers scratching their heads, and perhaps even wondering if I had slipped, if only momentarily, into a paranoid delusional state.

Not so.

The impetus for writing that post was an urgent message that I received on October 28, 2020 through my contact page from someone I do not know (and whose name I’ll withhold out of respect). This unusual message was forwarded, according to the timestamp, on October 10, 2020.

These dates are relevant to what I’m about to share, so please keep them in mind.

And now, without further delay, my explanation for the apparent paranoia . . .

An Exercise in Critical Thinking

I must admit from the outset that it’s hard to know who or what to believe these days.

As I daily peruse countless articles and videos on all manner of topics related to personal freedom and COVID-19, the very consciousness of humanity itself appears to be bifurcating along a psychological fault line that seems to grow deeper and wider by the day, along with hints of desperation that “it’s the end of the world as we know it, and so let’s do everything we can to save ourselves.”

The current situation on Earth is clearly serving as a strong catalyst for growth (intellectual, spiritual, and emotional), pitting those who favor what is being called The Great Awakening against those who favor what is being called The Great Reset. Amidst all manner of accusations and allegations, a new understanding of our place in the world is arising out of the ashes of an Old World Order.

What I’m about to share is quite disturbing, if not downright intolerable, but the way I see it is that if we are to have any chance of tapping the heart of contribution as we move into the future with eyes and ears wide open, we had better be prepared to do some serious soul searching.

The message that follows has already been “debunked” by certain “fact checkers,” but as any critical thinker knows, even the debunkers can be soundly debunked. You can tell when they haven’t done their homework, when they haven’t given adequate thought to the issues at hand, when they haven’t taken into account “the big picture,” or when they haven’t given due process to heartfelt testimony.

Debunkers are a special breed who seem oblivious to their own biases and prejudices, all the more so when they are sponsored or patronized by those who would keep certain points of view hidden from view. Debunkers, however, to their credit, do offer a great deal of food for thought.

So here’s what I propose to do: (1) present the message for your consideration; if in reading it you are disturbed to the point of turning away and never coming back, I nevertheless thank you for giving it a try; you’re welcome back at any time; (2) respond personally to this message point by point, while inserting commentary where appropriate to add context; and (3) present a sensible course of action.

Before I share the message, note that The Office of the Prime Minister (of Canada) is abbreviated as the PMO, described as “a wholly partisan organization made up of political staff,” founded in the late 1960s at around the time that Pierre Elliott Trudeau became Prime Minister.

Here’s the message (edited slightly by yours truly for clarity and consistency):


I want to provide you some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups, but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning Committee (steered by the PMO).

I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian, and more importantly, as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children, but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes.

The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows:

(1) phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward (expected by November 2020)

(2) daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID-related deaths following the same growth curves (expected by end of November 2020)

(3) rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory (expected by December 2020)

(4) complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions) (expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021)

(5) reform and expansion of the unemployment program into the universal basic income program (expected by Q1 2021)

(6) projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection (expected by February 2021)

(7) daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity (expected Q1 – Q2 2021)

(8) enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city) (expected Q2 2021)

(9) transitioning individuals into the universal basic income program (expected mid Q2 2021)

(10) projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability (expected late Q2 2021)

(11) deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area (expected by Q3 2021)

(12) along with this road map, the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way to transition Canadians to meet an unprecedented economic endeavor, one that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians.

What we were told was that to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on an international scale, the federal government was going to offer Canadians total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc), which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program.

In exchange for acceptance of total debt forgiveness, the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide individuals with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo ID referred to as Canada’s HealthPass).

Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details.” Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer, we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely.

Over a short period of time, as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refuse to participate will be deemed a public safety risk and be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities, they would be given two options: (1) participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or (2) stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized. So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end, it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not.

This won’t just be Canada, but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed, and the ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing, were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it.

All I know is that I don’t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future.

Again, keep in mind that this message was sent to me on October 28, 2020 and originally sent out on or before October 10, 2020. The first two benchmarks of the plan have already begun to see the light of day, which I find very interesting. The third benchmark seems unbelievable, but if you do your due diligence (and your research), you’ll discover some very interesting if not troubling facts about it.

Here’s my personal response:

I want to provide you some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups, but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning Committee (steered by the PMO).

Thank you for sharing this information. I must say that much of it rings true for me. Granted, there is no Strategic Planning Committee listed with the House of Commons or the Senate, and there is no official recognition of same from any spokesperson with the PMO itself. It does, however, make sense to me that an office as vital as the PMO would have a steering committee for strategic planning.

Note to reader: the role of a steering committee is to provide advice, ensure the delivery of project outputs, and achieve projected outcomes. A steering committee also lends support, guidance, and oversight to progress; members do not usually work on the project themselves.

I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this, but I have to. As a Canadian, and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children, but for other children as well.

Given the content of your message, I can appreciate your sense of urgency.

The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals.

This statement also rings true. I’m not surprised that 70% of the members seem compliant, but in their defense, I would say that they probably feel caught between a rock and a hard place. I would also be quite interested in gaining some insight into “they.” Who are “they?”

They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes.

Again, no surprise here. Clearly, some very sensitive and highly classified intel.

The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows:

(1) phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward (expected by November 2020)

In Toronto, where I live, these restrictions were enacted on Monday, November 23, 2020.

(2) daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID-related deaths following the same growth curves (expected by end of November 2020)

Right on schedule (as of this writing, on November 28, 2020). I find it curious that “new cases” are emphasized with little or no mention of actual fatalities; “new cases” also likely includes quite a few false positives; also, the terminology, COVID-related deaths, seems like a slippery one. Did the patient die with SARS-CoV2 or from SARS-CoV2? Is the data accurate or is it being fudged?

(3) rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory (expected by December 2020)

This projection is not as bizarre as it might sound. Even official bodies, like the CDC in the USA, have given this prospect serious attention. Note to reader: the term “isolation facility” might be taken as a euphemism for “quarantine camp;” how do you think the MSM will spin this?

(4) complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions) (expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021)

Right after Christmas. Someone seems to have a heart, after all. I wonder how official public health bodies and MSM outlets will massage the numbers and spin the official narrative to make it seem plausible to the public, even if they’re not aware that this what they’re doing.

(5) reform and expand the unemployment program into the universal basic income program (expected by Q1 2021)

This projection is logically consistent with the stricter lockdowns.

(6) projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection (expected by February 2021)

This projection sounds crazy scary, and almost unbelievable to entertain with any seriousness. I wonder: is a new designer coronavirus waiting in the wings to be released? At least we have December and January to prepare ourselves (and our immune systems) for the onslaught.

By the way, there’s a TV movie in post-production called COVID-21: Lethal Virus.

Are you prepared to watch it when it comes out (if it comes out)?

(7) daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity (expected Q1 – Q2 2021)

This looks to be for real, adding to the contagion of fear necessary to introduce next steps.

(8) enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city) (expected Q2 2021)

Full travel restrictions will further increase the perception of need for travel passes linked to health status; it will also facilitate the rollout of the necessary digital infrastructure to track and trace travellers with digital IDs from one country, province, city, and/or town to the next.

This socio-economic squeeze play also seems entirely justified in light of the previous benchmark. Unfortunately, the livelihoods of many will be adversely affected, many of them irreparably. Note to reader: if you enjoy travel, may I suggest a personal compilation of travel videos?

(9) transitioning individuals into the universal basic income program (expected mid Q2 2021)

Sounds wonderful, until you scratch the surface. In accepting the unearned, what is expected in return? Will the expectations be reasonable? Certainly, it will act as a hedge against the many jobs that will be lost as advanced infrastructures of artificial intelligence come online.

(10) projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability (expected late Q2 2021).

The preppers will have a field day with this one. With everyone having access to the UBI (Universal Basic Income), however, the public can likely expect advanced notice to stock up on food and supplies. The timing also seems appropriate, given warmer weather expected in late June.

(11) deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area (expected by Q3 2021)

This projection makes sense in view of benchmarks 6 through 11 as public bewilderment rises.

(12) along with this road map, the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way to transition Canadians to meet an unprecedented economic endeavor, one that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians

An unprecedented economic endeavor that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians: this sounds momentous. I can only wonder at this point what this endeavor might entail ~ and require ~ for me personally, and for members of Canadian society.

What we were told was that to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on an international scale, the federal government was going to offer Canadians total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc), which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program.

In exchange for acceptance of total debt forgiveness, the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide individuals with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo ID referred to as Canada’s HealthPass).

Two points come to mind: (1) not everyone will be subject to this debt relief initiative (most notably, those who remain gainfully employed and are well-off and/or fiscally responsible enough to resist it, at least at first); and (2) the price of total debt forgiveness and the freedom to come and go as you please, however, seems rather high, given what is known about some vaccines and their constituents.

Not to mention the legal immunity to liability that vaccine manufacturers now enjoy. Incidentally, vaccines are not what they used to be. New experimental mRNA technology is revolutionizing the potency of vaccines. Note to reader: are you ready and willing to be a test subject?

But then again, perhaps this technology has already been pre-tested in secret.

Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details.” Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer, we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely.

The issue of mandatory vaccination is a delicate one.

Public support for vaccination has waned in recent months, partly in response to the speed at which vaccine trials have been conducted (are they safe?), partly in response to the introduction of mRNA technology (has it been tested over the long-term?), and partly because of scary reports on the Internet about the destructive potential of vaccines to incapacitate or exterminate certain groups of people.

The economic reset also raises questions: is this a communist plot? Is it an attempt to enslave large numbers of people? Or is it really a bargain for those ready and willing to brave the unknown and step into a new kind of world that serves them well in exchange for their cooperation?

How ready and willing would you be to forgo privacy and liberty for more stability and equality?

Over a short period of time, as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refuse to participate will be deemed a public safety risk and be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities, they would be given two options: (1) participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or (2) stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized. So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end, it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not.

No matter who agrees with it or not? On its face, this sounds draconian. Dig a little deeper, and perhaps another interpretation is possible: for example, from the perspective of an overseer, what technologies are being implemented and enforced in the interests of global security?

This won’t just be Canada, but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed, and the ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing, were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it.

From what I can see, the New World Order or the One World Order has been rebranded as The Great Reset in keeping with the byline of “build back better.” The global scope of this reset is also consistent with the United Nations’ goals of Agenda 21 (rebranded as Agenda 2030).

All I know is that I don’t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future.

A dark future (and a dark winter) is almost assured, at least in the months to come. I say “almost” because of the legal process that is currently being played out in the U.S.A. Based on results and accounting for states currently not called, still counting, recounting, under investigation or audit, or states with election issues now in the courts, President Trump is now winning the 2020 Presidential Election.

Many see Trump as a foil for the Great Reset; others see him as an obstacle to its realization. Whether or not Trump triumphs remains to be seen; whether or not he can serve as an effective foil also remains to be seen, even as the battle between security and liberty continues to be waged.

Where to Go? Who to Be? What to Do?

I’ll be the first to admit that that was a lot to take into consideration.

Unfortunately, it barely scratches the surface of our Collective Evolution. In these Waking Times, I feel it is more important than ever to find Stillness in the Storm alongside Natural News. The vital information is out there (in abundance); you just need to know where to look.

If you haven’t already figured it out, a sensible course of action by way of response requires a journey inward, not outward. As far as I can see, I am being called to be present and patient with promise, all the while fleshing out the details of one very big picture that is global in scope.

The Great Reset is an initiative promulgated by the World Economic Forum. It is said that the House of Windsor (Royal Family) and the United Nations are prime executive co-producers of the plan, working with top corporate sponsors like British Petroleum, Mastercard, and Microsoft to manage and massage the consequences of an ever-evolving COVID crisis towards beneficent outcomes.

The many disruptions of this crisis are exposing inadequacies, inconsistencies, and contradictions in multiple systems ~ everything from health systems, financial systems, energy systems, environmental systems, and educational systems. A moral justification for this planned crisis seems to be that when systems are stressed to the breaking point, new, emerging solutions present themselves.

Do the ends justify the means? Or do certain ends necessitate certain means?

Advanced technological means and ends wield a double-edged sword. Do we allow technological advances to fall into “the wrong hands,” and thereby risk security and prosperity on a global scale, or do we embrace said advances with and through a manufactured crisis to facilitate their incorporation into societies everywhere so as to prevent and manage associated risks to life and livelihood?

Even so, is there not a risk of being subject to a global technocratic dictatorship?

Essentially, technocracy is an economic system of resource allocation that revolves around technology ~ most notably, artificial intelligence, digital surveillance, and Big Data collection, involving the digitization of industry (which includes banking) and government, allowing for the automation of social engineering and social rule while eliminating the need for elected government leaders.

In light of this definition and description, what happens to political discourse and dissent? Will they be eliminated by fears of reprisal? To what extent will humanity be expected to move towards post-humanity? Will a time come when humanity is no longer relevant ~ or necessary?

What happens to privacy and liberty? Will it be enough to feel safe and secure?

In the wake of the COVID era, the endgame is not all that certain. In view of the crazy scary timeline outlined above, the temptation to slip and slide back into conformity and complacency is great. Why risk being branded as a conspiracy nut when you can just go along to get along?

This comfortable yet cowardly temptation seems rather appealing, does it not?

For those who have the courage, consider the following snapshot of the forementioned timeline as (1) a reminder of the possibilities to come, while noting that the first two benchmarks are already being realized; (2) a framework of study by which to participate in The Great Awakening vis a vis The Great Reset; (3) a remarkable catalyst for growth (emotional, intellectual, and spiritual); and (4) a guidance system by which to prepare for the worst case scenarios, most notably the possible release of a lethal virus early next year.

Forewarned is forearmed.


1
phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first, and then expanding outward (expected by November 2020; note: this is coming to pass)

2
daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID-related deaths following the same growth curves (expected by end of November 2020; note: this, too, is coming to pass)

3
rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory (expected by December 2020; note: how do you think the mainstream media will spin this?)

4
a complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions) (expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021)

5
reform and expand unemployment program in preparation for the universal basic income program (expected by Q1 2021 – some time between January 1 and March 31, 2021)

6
projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with a secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21), leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection (expected by February 2021)

7
daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations; COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity (expected Q1 – Q2 2021 – some time between February and June 2021)

8
enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as the Third Lock Down) will be implemented; full travel restrictions will be imposed (including restrictions on inter-province and inter-city travel) (expected Q2 2021 – some time between April 1 and June 30)

9
transition individuals into the universal basic income program (expected mid Q2 2021 – some time around May of 2021)

10
projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability (expected late Q2 2021, i.e., late June 2021)

11
deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints; restrict travel and movement, provide logistical support to the area (expected by Q3 2021 – some time between July 1 and September 30)

12
along with this road map, the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way to transition Canadians to meet an unprecedented economic endeavor, one that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians; which economic endeavor? and for what purpose?

In closing, I would caution against demonizing anyone in particular.

The likes of Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, and Klaus Schwab have their roles to play in the orchestration of this global reset, but my feeling is that they are merely the public faces of a deeper “carespiracy” in a bid to make this world a safer, more secure place to live for as many as possible, even if privacy and liberty must take a serious hit in the process for the sake of greater stability and equality.

But then, what could be so important that widespread deceptions must be applied? It’s certainly something to think about in the weeks and months ahead. Care? Or comfort? Courage? Or conformity? Confrontation? Or complacency? Spontaneous Order or the Perfect Order?

In which direction are you leaning?